Is It Beneficial to Use Generative AI in Missiology?

I was asked to research and recommend some policies on the use of Generative AI (“Artificial Intelligence”) at the seminary where I teach. I had to do some study of this since my involvement with AI is quite limited. Reading experts, including policies of some universities, it is clear that a nuanced approach would be the best route. Some find value in the use of Generative AI in the learning process.

I wanted to try this myself. Therefore I submitted the following question to two different AI engines:


What role does the localization of theology have in the growth of the church in new regions?

On June 1, 2024, I submitted this question to Chat GPT (https://chatgpt.com/), and to Copilot (https://www.bing.com), these were the responses I got:

Neither gave me footnotes, but Copilot was kind enough to give me references. Looking over the responses, I can see uses at the Pre-drafting stage. That is, Generative AI can help me evaluate topics, give me some references to study more, and even give possible ideas for outlines. Doing this should help the learning process— something that definitely does not happen if one simply “cut-and-paste” the answer as one’s own completed work.

Of course, there are cautions.

First, AI is known to hallucinate. It can make up references.

Second, AI can share false information and reference incorrectly. I had this happen before where I asked for a biography of a person, and it indicated that he worked for me. The reference the AI gave was to my website but it certainly did not say that he worked for me.

Third, AI crowdsources data so it shares opinions and biases without good verification.

Fourth, related to the previous point, does not necessarily verify the quality of the data it draws from.

Leave a Reply